Search
Close this search box.

Katrina Armstrong’s apology caused outrage at Columbia University

Katrina Armstrong, MD. Photo: Jörg Meyer/Columbia University.

Apology to Protesters and University Reactions

Columbia University’s new president, Professor Katrina Armstrong, apologized to pro-Palestinian students who were arrested during anti-Israel protests in April. Jewish students and faculty, however, expressed outrage, calling her statement “evidence of moral decay” within the institution. The report was published on September 21 by Vesty.

Armstrong’s Statement and Reason for Apology

In her first interview with the university’s student newspaper, Armstrong stated, “I understand how difficult this is, but I want everyone to know: I deeply regret the harm caused during the police raid.” The police stormed the campus during the protests, resulting in over 200 arrests. While Armstrong does not take responsibility for the police actions, she acknowledged witnessing the pain inflicted and expressed sorrow over it.

Jewish Community’s Response

Jewish students and faculty viewed Armstrong’s apology as an expression of solidarity with pro-Palestinian activists rather than support for those who suffered from antisemitic attacks during the protests. Jewish students had previously accused the university administration of failing to protect them from ongoing harassment by protesters.

Criticism from Faculty Members

Dr. Yoel Brooks, a professor at the medical faculty, told Ynet that Armstrong’s apology was “a disgrace to the university,” highlighting the absence of any apology to Jewish students who were targeted by antisemitic attacks. He pointed out that these protests have spread beyond the campus, putting the safety of Jews at risk.

Condemnation of University Leadership

Professor Asaf Zeevi from the business administration department called the apology “excessive and disappointing.” He argued that the university is fostering a generation that avoids responsibility for its actions. According to him, Armstrong’s actions undermine the moral and ethical standards expected in a university setting.

University’s Response

In response to the criticism, the university stated that President Armstrong is working to listen to a broad range of students, ensuring their safety and respect for all.