Foto:State Bureau of Investigation
August 25, Odesa – On Sunday, August 25, Ukraine’s State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) formally charged Member of Parliament Artem Dmytruk in a case involving the illegal crossing of the national border. This announcement followed Dmytruk’s own claims on his Telegram channel that criminal charges were being prepared against him, which he described as an “attempt to strip him of his political rights.”
Fleeing to Moldova and Law Enforcement Response
Dmytruk, a pro-Russian politician who has drawn controversy in recent months, is suspected of fleeing to Moldova. This action has sparked a swift response from both the public and law enforcement. An SBI investigation team is currently operating in Odesa, focusing on uncovering the details of how Dmytruk crossed the border and identifying those who aided him in the escape.
“Urgent investigative actions are underway to determine the circumstances of the illegal border crossing, including searches of civilians and State Border Service personnel who may have been involved,” the SBI’s press service reported.
Political Statements and Allegations of Manipulation
Before fleeing, Dmytruk openly criticized the actions of Ukrainian intelligence services, claiming they were attempting to discredit him and prevent him from continuing his political activities. He asserted that these actions were part of a larger political persecution aimed at silencing him and his viewpoints.
This is not the first time Dmytruk’s name has appeared in criminal headlines. He was previously suspected of assaulting a military officer, a case that sparked significant public outcry.
What’s Next for the Investigation?
The investigation continues, with authorities conducting searches and questioning individuals who may have been involved in facilitating Dmytruk’s illegal border crossing. Additional charges may be brought against the MP and those who assisted him.
This case unfolds against the backdrop of a politically charged environment in Ukraine, where pro-Russian politicians are facing increasing scrutiny. The outcome of Dmytruk’s case could serve as an important indicator of how the state handles such challenges moving forward.
As the public watches closely, more details are expected to emerge, potentially leading to further legal consequences for Dmytruk and his alleged accomplices.
